Serving Southeastern Minnesota and Western Wisconsin
        (651) 923-4496                        (800) 732-1439

Tuesday, September 16, 2014  
Weather |  Futures |  Market News |  Headline News |  DTN Ag Headlines |  Charts |  Futures Markets |  Options |  Corn News |  Soybeans News |  US Ag News |  Portfolio 
 Red Wing Bids
 Local Grain Bids
 Benson Farm Service Bids
 Agronomy Contacts
 Daily Dairy Report
 Zumbrota Hay Auction
 USDA Reports
 eAgVantage AGP
 eAgVantage WWN
 eAgVantage WWAS
 eAgVantage BFS
 iview Red Wing Grain
 Employee Login
Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
Congress Scrutinizes Obama Strategy    09/16 06:09

   President Barack Obama's strategy to combat Islamic State extremists in Iraq 
and Syria is being scrutinized in Congress, where the expanded military 
campaign has broad support but faces skepticism rooted in more than a decade of 

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama's strategy to combat Islamic State 
extremists in Iraq and Syria is being scrutinized in Congress, where the 
expanded military campaign has broad support but faces skepticism rooted in 
more than a decade of war.

   Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the 
Joint Chiefs of Staff, were scheduled to testify Tuesday before the Senate 
Armed Services Committee, the first in a series of high-profile Capitol Hill 
hearings that will measure the president's ability to rally congressional 

   Obama last week outlined his military plan to destroy the extremists, 
authorizing U.S. airstrikes inside Syria, stepping up attacks in Iraq and 
deploying additional American troops, with more than 1,000 now advising and 
assisting Iraqi security forces to counter the terrorism threat. The U.S. 
conducted the first of the airstrikes Monday, going to the aid of Iraqi 
security forces who were being attacked by enemy fighters.

   The president said he had the authority to order the airstrikes without new 
congressional approval. Obama did ask Congress to authorize a program to train 
and arm vetted Syrian rebels battling the Islamic State group and forces loyal 
to Syrian President Bashar Assad, a program that got a boost Monday as House 
Republicans pushed to authorize the mission.

   Still, there were doubters.

   "I support the president 1,000 percent on air support. I do not support the 
training of Syrian rebels," Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., a member of the Armed 
Services Committee, said Monday. His reservations stemmed from the "eight 
years, $20 billion to train" the Iraqi forces after the U.S. invasion in March 
2003. "See what the outcome was there," he said.

   Another member of the committee, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., questioned the 
administration's resolve.

   "How serious are we? We could have bombed Syria yesterday. We could have 
taken out ISIS. I can point out to them targets on a map," McCain said Monday. 
The Islamic State group is sometimes called ISIS or ISIL.

   Racing to finish its work and leave Washington for midterm campaigning, 
House Republicans finalized legislation to authorize the mission to arm and 
train moderate Syrian rebels.

   The authorization under consideration likely will be included as an 
amendment to a spending bill Congress must pass to keep the government open 
until mid-December. That would give lawmakers the opportunity to hold a 
separate debate and vote on the matter --- something members of both parties 

   The House Rules Committee voted late Monday to have six hours of debate on 
the amendment, once it is taken up, with a vote possible as early as Wednesday. 
House Republicans planned to meet Tuesday to discuss the legislation.

   Bowing to congressional fears that any vote is tantamount to a war vote, the 
legislation includes a provision stating that "nothing in this section shall be 
construed to constitute a specific statutory authorization for the introduction 
of U.S. armed forces into hostilities or into situations wherein hostilities 
are clearly indicated by the circumstances."

   The provision reflects a congressional divide between hawks seeking tougher 
action than that proposed by Obama and lawmakers weary from more than a decade 
of U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

   The measure compels the Pentagon to present Congress with a plan 15 days 
before any training begins and requires ongoing updates every 90 days. The 
administration isn't likely to protest the conditions.

   The U.S. plan is to develop moderate Syrian forces at Saudi Arabian training 
sites before helping them return to the battlefield. It's unclear how long they 
would need to be trained to be battle-ready or how the U.S. could ensure their 
attention remained on fighting extremists and not just the Syrian government.

   Many Republicans and Democrats have expressed reservations about the ability 
to identify moderates in a country awash with rebel formations and shifting 
alliances. The Islamic State grew out of the al-Qaida movement, but the two are 
now fighting. In some instances, the moderate Free Syrian Army has teamed with 
al-Qaida's local franchise, the Nusra Front.

   The House's effort would provide lawmakers with information on the vetting 
process and which groups were being recruited. The administration didn't ask 
for money to conduct the arming and training mission because it expects foreign 
donors to fund the program. In any case, the Pentagon has billions of dollars 
in wartime contingency funds it can ask Congress to release.

   Hagel testifies again before the House panel Thursday. Secretary of State 
John Kerry appears before separate panels Wednesday and Thursday.


Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN