Report Debunks Benghazi Allegations 11/22 13:08
The CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on
a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, a Republican-controlled House
committee has found. Its report asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The CIA and the military acted properly in responding to
the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, a
Republican-controlled House committee has found. Its report asserted no
wrongdoing by Obama administration officials.
Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies,
the two-year investigation of the politically charged incident determined that
there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no
missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly
shipping arms from Libya to Syria.
In the immediate aftermath of the attack, intelligence about who carried it
out and why was contradictory, the report found. That led Susan Rice, then U.S.
ambassador to the United Nations, to inaccurately assert that the attack had
evolved from a protest, when in fact there had been no protest. But it was
intelligence analysts, not political appointees, who made the wrong call, the
committee found. The report did not conclude that Rice or any other government
official acted in bad faith or intentionally misled the American people.
The House Intelligence Committee report was released with little fanfare on
the Friday before Thanksgiving week. Many of its findings echo those of six
previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State
Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a
House Select Committee appointed in May.
The attacks in Benghazi killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, foreign
service officer Sean Smith, and two CIA contractors, Tyrone S. Woods and Glen
Doherty. A Libyan extremist, Ahmed Abu Khatalla, is facing trial on murder
charges after he was captured in Libya and taken to the U.S.
In the aftermath of the attacks, Republicans criticized the Obama
administration and its then-secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is
expected to run for president in 2016. People in and out of government have
alleged that a CIA response team was ordered to "stand down" after the State
Department compound came under attack, that a military rescue was nixed, that
officials intentionally downplayed the role of al-Qaida figures in the attack,
and that Stevens and the CIA were involved in a secret operation to spirit
weapons out of Libya and into the hands of Syrian rebels. None of that is true,
according to the House Intelligence Committee report.
The report did find, however, that the State Department facility where
Stevens and Smith were killed was not well-protected, and that State Department
security agents knew they could not defend it from a well-armed attack.
Previous reports have found that requests for security improvements were not
acted upon in Washington.
"We spent thousands of hours asking questions, poring over documents,
reviewing intelligence assessments, reading cables and emails, and held a total
of 20 committee events and hearings," said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the
committee's chairman, and Rep. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger of Maryland, the
ranking Democrat, in a joint statement.
"We conducted detailed interviews with senior intelligence officials from
Benghazi and Tripoli as well as eight security personnel on the ground in
Benghazi that night. Based on the testimony and the documents we reviewed, we
concluded that all the CIA officers in Benghazi were heroes. Their actions
saved lives," they said.
Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who serves on the intelligence panel
and the Benghazi select committee, said, "It's my hope that this report will
put to rest many of the questions that have been asked and answered yet again,
and that the Benghazi Select Committee will accept these findings and instead
focus its attention on the State Department's progress in securing our
facilities around the world and standing up our fast response capabilities."
Some of the harshest charges have been leveled at Rice, now Obama's national
security adviser, who represented the Obama administration on Sunday talk shows
the weekend after the attack. Rice repeated talking points that wrongly
described a protest over a video deemed offensive to Muslims.
But Rice's comments were based on faulty intelligence from multiple
agencies, according to the report. Analysts received 21 reports that a protest
occurred in Benghazi, the report said ---14 from the Open Source Center, which
reviews news reports; one from the CIA; two from the Defense Department; and
four from the National Security Agency.
In the years since, some participants in the attack have said they were
motivated by the video. The attackers were a mix of extremists and hangers on,
the investigation found.
"To this day," the report said, "significant intelligence gaps regarding the
identities, affiliations and motivations of the attackers remain."